Samsung RF29DB9750 Running Cost (Refrigerator)
What the Samsung RF29DB9750 costs to run
At 704 kWh/yr, the Samsung RF29DB9750's ENERGY STAR certification puts it one of the more expensive models in its category to run against every other certified refrigerator.
The $132 figure above uses the simple average of all 51 published state rates. Pick your state for the real number.
Samsung RF29DB9750 against the category
That's 82.4% above the refrigerator category average of 386 kWh/yr, and ranks 4,491 of 4,704 certified refrigerators for annual running cost, 1 being cheapest. The category average comes from every refrigerator ENERGY STAR currently certifies (4,704 models), not an outside benchmark, about $60/year above that average at the national rate. See the methodology page.
What sits beside it in the ranking
Samsung RF27T5201 ($133/yr, 705 kWh/yr) costs a little more to run than the Samsung RF29DB9750. Samsung RF29DB9700 ($132/yr, 704 kWh/yr) costs a little less.
Same brand, different models
Samsung makes 101 ENERGY STAR certified refrigerators; this one ranks 78 of 101 for running cost, between the brand's cheapest, the RT18DG6300 at $63/yr, and its priciest, the RF32CG5B30 at $148/yr.
Samsung RF29DB9750 over 13 years
Over the 13-year service life NAHB reports for this category, running the Samsung RF29DB9750 costs roughly $1,721 in electricity, separate from the purchase price.
Shopping for a new one
At $132/year, this is on the expensive side for a refrigerator; the cheapest certified model in this category runs about $8/year, worth knowing before buying either the Samsung RF29DB9750 or its replacement.
See what else is certified in this category before you decide.
Protecting what you have
At $132/year just to run, a refrigerator is worth protecting against an unplanned repair bill on top of that.
Sourcing
The full Refrigerator category page shows all 4,704 refrigerators ranked by cost; the state-rate guide covers the half of this number that isn't the appliance. The 704 kWh/yr figure is ENERGY STAR's own certification, not a wattage estimate; exact dataset IDs are on the data sources page.